In my previous post, I argued that two things can help bring to life a truly semantic web: the first one is the Linked Data medium. One person commented that Linked Data is not just a medium, but creates meaning. I see the point, if you assert that meaning is created through data transformation, as one can process RDF triples (the Linked Data format) through SPARQL (the query language, like SQL for databases) and also create new associations of triples linked through common URIs (universal concept addresses – I described them in the previous post, and you can double-click on the word for a definition). Depending on how you define meaning, you could characterize that as meaning-creating. Or not.
Let me specify my thoughts further. As I see it, the biggest hurdle in enabling the semantic web right now is in creating “clean” triples, and the right links to the right URIs, from unstructured data. That type of data transformation from unstructured to structured really is where 80% of the meaning (to pick a number that sounds right – let me bet that too will get me interesting tweets) is added. That’s why, in most cases, it’s still best done by humans. Because it’s tough. And it’s tough because it adds lots of value to the original data. (more…)


