Posts for July, 2009

Linked Data, a brand with big problems and no brand management

July 22nd, 2009 by Greg Boutin

This post builds on the discussion that started on Twitter between Paul Miller and Ian Davis and quickly expanded to a few other folks. Paul subsequently wrote a blog post Does Linked Data need RDF?, and so did Ian Davis with The Linked Data Brand.

My turn:

I like Davis’s suggested approach of looking as Linked Data as a brand.

It made me realize something: this brand hasn’t been properly managed.

At this point in time, it’s clear that beyond its inner tech circle, Linked Data is more often perceived as a technology that has wasted a lot more R&D funding than it should have, than as a solution to a problem. (more…)

35 Comments »

Blog comments showing in Canadian Business print magazine this week

July 19th, 2009 by Greg Boutin

I am glad to report that Canadian Business decided to reprint the main part of a post I wrote in May on this blog, pointing out the weakness of their argument against the Green Energy Act.

It’s not online so I can’t point to it, but you will find it on P8 of the August 17, 2009 issue (they pre-date their magazine), the first comment on the page, entitled “California Dreamin’” (unfortunately this title misleads the reader about the nature of the argument, but let’s not be too picky…)  The fact that they publish a pretty strong critique like this one speaks volume about the willingness of the magazine to show all sides of a story. Kudos to Canadian Business!

No Comments »

Attention Web 3.0 start-ups: redirect 25% of your R&D budget to market validation

July 9th, 2009 by Greg Boutin

In my observations on the Semantic Technology conference last month, I mentioned I would be blogging separately about the dire lack of investments by Web 3.0 start-ups in market understanding and marketing.

Before I start, let me signal some conflict of interest here: in the course of my job, I lead efforts on market understanding and positioning, brand awareness and lead generation. The idea is that developing my market is in the interest of start-ups with a stake in Web 3.0 and the semantic web. I get more business when they do :) But please do discount my words for this bias, and decide for yourself, when all is said and done, whether we have a solid case here or not.

My main claim with this post is that companies in the Web 3.0 and semantic web space are downright bad at filling unmet
needs, packaging their offer effectively and cutting through the market
noise to secure users and revenues. It even appears this incapacity to grow revenues has a direct impact on their
ability to make money (ok, it’s sunny outside, after five days of clouds there is no harm in having a little fun, is there? ;)

The large and growing number of players at SemTech told me that we are already in a crowded market. And yet: few real products, and very few sales. Most of the people there live on R&D funding from public institutions and overtrusting angels, not client receivables.

Why? (more…)

2 Comments »

Video of the Semantic Web Gang at Semantic Tech 2009

July 8th, 2009 by Greg Boutin

Here is the video of the live podcast we recorded at the Semantic Tech conference, courtesy Semantic Universe and Paul Miller who arranged to have this recording.

The sound is a little lacking so plug your earphones to hear better. An MP3 will also be posted soon by Paul is available on the gang's page.

Disclaimer: I am not responsible for putting my own pic on the video screenshot!

Lastly, my company name was misspelled "Growthrate" in the introduction, which is funny. Maybe I'll use that if I launch some economic analysis subsidiary :)

PS. you can also find an MP3 for the panel I moderated on Business Models here

The Semantic Web Gang looks back at SemTech 2009 from Semantic Universe on Vimeo.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

No Comments »

Will We Soon See a Rally on Web 3.0 Start-Ups? My Take on Semantic Tech

July 7th, 2009 by Greg Boutin

About 3 weeks ago, I left a warm Canadian sun to fly south to San Jose’s chilly weather, and attend the Semantic Technology conference. Or, let’s be fair, 1.5 days out of the five the event lasted. The rest, mostly, I followed through Twitter, which by all accounts tends to be a little like watching the Olympics on TV, as opposed to being in the stadium: you don’t get the pop corn and hot dog breeze, but in the end you know more about the games than people who were there (and not on Twitter too… it gets quickly confusing.)

Of course, the big objective at “Sem Tech” is networking. Thanks to the nice folks of Semantic Universe (thank you Eric and Steve), I managed to make it, last minute, onto the exclusive list of VC Connect, a cocktail reception which gathered both fundraising CEOs and investors (of whom more attended than I thought there would be. I guess the free hors d’oeuvres did the trick). I stroke most great conversations there (apologies to those I met outside of VC Connect!)

So, my impressions of the event. I know those are late but I’m not competing with news organizations, just with analysts, so that’s ok!

Overall, it was sort of “hot and cold”: there were lots of very positive signs and, by all admissions, there is still a lot to do before Web 3.0 and the Semantic Web truly happen.

Key mental notes I made to myself: (more…)

4 Comments »