Posts tagged ‘venture capital’

The art of Inception for fundraising entrepreneurs (“Logos”)

June 23rd, 2011 by Greg Boutin
Inception-movie-poster

Image by Shing Yan via Flickr

In the movie Inception, any logical incoherence in the structure of a dream threatens to interrupt the dreamer’s suspension of disbelief – and wake them up. Pitching investors is a lot like incepting them: they need to (literally) buy into your dream. And likewise, the logic of your case must be flawless.

What makes it even harder is that, just like in the movie, most investors’ subconscious is militarized. Professional investors in particular, such as venture capitalists, have developed a fairly good BS detector, and will kick you out of their heads quickly if they detect logical impossibilities in your case. Friends and family are easier, but that’s because you’ve already overcome one of the key defense mechanisms: trust (we’ll come back to that point later in this series of post). Usually they will still turn you down if they don’t believe in your dream, though. (more…)

No Comments »

Preparing a leak detection technology provider for fundraising

February 4th, 2011 by Greg Boutin
A fire hydrant.

Image via Wikipedia

This Canadian provider of pipe leak detection solutions has a fantastic technology. When I got involved, it was clear that the sky was the limit – if only commercialization capabilities could be beefed up.

In the water business, technology is only one driver of market adoption. Even more so when clients are municipalities, and the company is looking for investors. (more…)

No Comments »

Suggestions for public support to entrepreneurs (troubling facts about MaRS Discovery District – Part 4 of 4)

April 27th, 2010 by Greg Boutin
Sunrise at North Point Park, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Image via Wikipedia

As my previous posts show, Ontario’s current hub-centric model for promoting innovation and entrepreneurship is expensive, unfair, and ineffective. The Minister of Research and Innovation should take note and explore alternative models, rather than continuing to pour taxpayer’s dollars into an expanding bureaucratic network with high fixed costs and built-in inefficiencies.

The Chamber of Commerce in Ottawa has taken notice too and is criticizing the lack of oversight of OCRI and its expansion in activities it traditionally conducted, according to an article in the Ottawa Business Journal yesterday.

To explore alternatives and fuel a discussion, I have highlighted a menu of options below. As a disclaimer, I am not a policy expert on the matter of entrepreneurship, but a practitioner, so do please consider those as draft proposals for crowdsourced discussion and improvement.

(more…)

7 Comments »

Financial Post doesn’t read GrowthTimes, wakes up on the Ontario Emerging Technologies Matching Fund

January 13th, 2010 by Greg Boutin
The wordmark of the Government of Ontario, fea...
Image via Wikipedia

Karen Mazurkewich, Financial Post, in an interesting article on Monday entitled “The new uber-angels” comparing the VC-fund approaches of Ontario and Quebec, declares on the Ontario Venture Capital Fund that “What Ontario didn’t — or couldn’t — predict was the lack of potential co-investors for these funds.”

Karen, I would invite you and Ontario’s decision-makers to step up your due diligence and review Growth Times’s August 4th, 2009 blog post entitled “Who Will Match Ontario’s $250M Emerging Technologies Matching Fund?”…………….. (more…)

5 Comments »

Venture capital: from the moon back to the mean

October 16th, 2009 by Greg Boutin
A plot of a normal distribution (or bell curve...

Image via Wikipedia

Josh Kopelman, Managing Director of First Round Capital, wrote a great post today building on Fred Wilson‘s VC math problem, and call Why VC Performance Has Fallen Off A Cliff.

I argued in a recent post that in parallel to the “moonshot” approach Josh rightly describes as the norm for VCs,  there must be a model that focuses on extracting revenues from a portfolio of tech companies with lesser risk.

Overall, it’s pretty clear to me that what we call VC companies should cover the entire risk-return frontier for any early-stage tech company, because that would allow large investors to place their bet as they like in this category. I’m not suggesting VCs turn into bankers or private equity investors, but there is a clear case for filling the early-stage funding gap towards tech ventures that hold less risk and more proven revenue models than moonshots. (more…)

No Comments »